IJHG

official impact factor 2.34

Open Access Methodology

Linking GPS and travel diary data using sequence alignment in a study of children's independent mobility

Suzanne Mavoa1*, Melody Oliver2,3, Karen Witten1 and Hannah M Badland4

Author Affiliations

1 SHORE and Whariki Research Centre, School of Public Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

2 National Institute for Public Health and Mental Health Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

3 Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

4 The McCaughey Centre: VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population Health, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

International Journal of Health Geographics 2011, 10:64 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-10-64

Published: 5 December 2011

Abstract

Background

Global positioning systems (GPS) are increasingly being used in health research to determine the location of study participants. Combining GPS data with data collected via travel/activity diaries allows researchers to assess where people travel in conjunction with data about trip purpose and accompaniment. However, linking GPS and diary data is problematic and to date the only method has been to match the two datasets manually, which is time consuming and unlikely to be practical for larger data sets. This paper assesses the feasibility of a new sequence alignment method of linking GPS and travel diary data in comparison with the manual matching method.

Methods

GPS and travel diary data obtained from a study of children's independent mobility were linked using sequence alignment algorithms to test the proof of concept. Travel diaries were assessed for quality by counting the number of errors and inconsistencies in each participant's set of diaries. The success of the sequence alignment method was compared for higher versus lower quality travel diaries, and for accompanied versus unaccompanied trips. Time taken and percentage of trips matched were compared for the sequence alignment method and the manual method.

Results

The sequence alignment method matched 61.9% of all trips. Higher quality travel diaries were associated with higher match rates in both the sequence alignment and manual matching methods. The sequence alignment method performed almost as well as the manual method and was an order of magnitude faster. However, the sequence alignment method was less successful at fully matching trips and at matching unaccompanied trips.

Conclusions

Sequence alignment is a promising method of linking GPS and travel diary data in large population datasets, especially if limitations in the trip detection algorithm are addressed.

Keywords:
GPS; travel diaries; sequence alignment