Table 7

Residents of Perth admitted to hospital, 1994–1998, by socioeconomic disadvantage of area for selected area levels

Quintile
Individuals admitted
Separations




CD
Postcode
SLA
CD
Postcode
SLA


Number
Q1: Least disadvantaged
126 615
123 380
138 127
294 130
303 131
340 294
Q2
130 907
123 465
114 244
294 307
326 652
279 537
Q3
133 073
126 770
142 107
316 066
328 999
363 908
Q4
124 279
128 863
123 199
327 228
328 630
313 879
Q5: Most disadvantaged
142 704
155 100
139 901
433 577
377 896
367 690
Total
657 578
657 578
657 578
1 665 308
1 665 308
1 665 308

Rate (per 100 000 population)
Q1: Least disadvantaged
51 442
48 247
51 950
119 813
120 567
127 986
Q2
53 343
48 239
52 235
120 582
129 945
127 810
Q3
53 889
48 789
52 656
127 995
126 618
134 841
Q4
50 919
51 263
52 564
133 342
128 400
133 920
Q5: Most disadvantaged
58 130
61 691
58 491
176 157
147 734
153 728
Total
53 547
53 547
53 547
135 607
135 607
135 607
Rate ratio: Ratio of rate in Q5 rate in Q1
1.13***
1.28***
1.13***
1.47***
1.23***
1.20***

The extent of any inequality is shown by the rate ratio, which expresses the ratio of the rate in Quintile 5 to the rate in Quintile 1; rate ratios indicating differing significantly from 1.0 are shown with * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Glover et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2004 3:30   doi:10.1186/1476-072X-3-30

Open Data