Table 1 |
|
The CIET fact-finding/feedback cycle |
| 1. Identification of the issue to be researched, for example, access to water and
sanitation, access to and use of services, adequate food supply, etc. |
| 2. Ordering and analysis of data from routine sources and previous studies, attempting
to align data in three analytical categories: impact, coverage, and costs. |
| 3. Development of the instruments including precise objectives, questionnaire, key
informant interviews, data entry format, and report outline. |
| 4. Pilot testing including data entry and analysis. |
| 5. Fieldwork including household questionnaires and qualitative techniques (key informants,
observation, focus group discussions). |
| 6. Data entry and preliminary analysis, identification of confounders and effect modifiers. |
| 7. Feedback and interaction in sentinel communities for interpretation and strategy
development. |
| 8. Completion of analysis, refinement of programme options. |
| 9. Development of the communication strategy that can be consultative process in the
same clusters. |
| 10. Communication of results to all communities, development of strategies of action
to resolve issues. |
|
|
|
Andersson and Mitchell International Journal of Health Geographics 2006 5:1 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-5-1 |
