Table 2 |
||||||
|
Comparison of model fit and sensitivity of detecting areas with an elevated risk |
||||||
| Neighbourhood type |
Kappa |
Fraction |
DIC |
AUC* |
Sensitivity of detecting SLAs with elevated risks (PP cut-off = 0.33) |
Specificity |
|
|
||||||
| Queen-1 |
0.05 |
22% |
2283 |
0.61 |
77% |
41% |
| Queen-2 |
0.05 |
51% |
2282 |
0.62 |
78% |
43% |
| Rook-1 |
0.05 |
14% |
2282 |
0.62 |
76% |
41% |
| Rook-2 |
0.05 |
41% |
2282 |
0.62 |
78% |
39% |
| Distance |
0.07 |
41% |
2274 |
0.62 |
80% |
30% |
| Weight-1 (1/distance) |
0.07 |
41% |
2213 |
0.62 |
80% |
30% |
| Weight-2 (1/distance2) |
0.12 |
98% |
2204 |
0.61 |
75% |
44% |
| Weight-3 (1/distance3) |
0.08 |
93% |
2218 |
0.59 |
75% |
46% |
| Weight 4 (Gravity) |
0.15 |
99% |
2202 |
0.60 |
74% |
39% |
| Weight 5 (Entropy) |
0.08 |
91% |
2227 |
0.60 |
74% |
47% |
| Weight 6 (Density) |
0.14 |
97% |
2208 |
0.60 |
74% |
37% |
| Weight 7 (Covariate) |
0.10 |
95% |
2210 |
0.62 |
74% |
47% |
|
|
||||||
|
* Area under curve from ROC analysis |
||||||
|
Earnest et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2007 6:54 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-6-54 |
||||||
