|
Correlations between contaminant values for each of 1,581 rural addresses for seven different geocoding methods. |
||||||||
| Geocoding Type |
Orthophoto |
E-911 |
TIGER geocoding with offset in feet |
|||||
| 0 |
200 |
400 |
600 |
800 |
||||
|
|
||||||||
| Orthophoto |
1.00 |
|||||||
| E-911 |
0.90 |
1.00 |
||||||
| TIGER geocoding with offsets in feet. |
0 |
0.65 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
||||
| 200 |
0.68 |
0.79 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
||||
| 400 |
0.71 |
0.79 |
0.94 |
0.97 |
1.00 |
|||
| 600 |
0.70 |
0.80 |
0.93 |
0.94 |
0.97 |
1.00 |
||
| 800 |
0.71 |
0.81 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
|
Mazumdar et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2008 7:13 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-13 |
||||||||