Table 6 |
|||
|
Pooled model state-specific effects (model intercept estimates) |
|||
|
Washington |
-0.05 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
|
Georgia |
-0.05 |
-0.02 |
-0.03 |
|
Utah |
-0.10 |
-0.08 |
-0.08 |
|
Connecticut |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
|
New Jersey |
-0.07 |
-0.04 |
-0.05 |
|
Kentucky |
-0.08 |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
|
Louisiana |
-0.07 |
-0.02 |
-0.03 |
|
Iowa |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
|
|
Michigan |
-0.04 |
||
|
New Mexico |
-0.06 |
-0.03 |
-0.04 |
|
|
|||
|
Notes: California is the omitted reference group. Blank (white) cells in the table appear for estimates that were not statistically significant at the 5% level or better. |
|||
|
Mobley et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2008 7:32 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-32 |
|||
