Table 4 |
||||
|
Summary of results of usability analysis. |
||||
|
Average time task one (minutes) |
Average time task two (minutes) |
Difference average time task one and two |
Average SUS |
|
|
|
||||
|
Sample |
3.27 (0.47–8) |
0.83 (0.1–2) |
2.44 |
68.50 (35–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
User group |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Clinics |
3.24 (1.6–5) |
1.16 (0.8 – 1.5) |
2.09 |
64.64 (55–72.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Community |
5.63 (2.5–8) |
1.23 (0.9–2) |
4.40 |
46.88 (35–75) |
|
|
||||
|
Convenience |
1.83 (0.47–3) |
0.32 (0.1–1.12) |
1.51 |
78.75 (45–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Municipality |
3.83 (2–6) |
0.95 (0.45–1.6) |
2.89 |
69.72 (62.5–85) |
|
|
||||
|
Level of computer use |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Coding |
2.92 (1.16–5) |
0.75 (0.1–1) |
2.17 |
66.88 (35–95) |
|
|
||||
|
Internet |
2.93 (0.47–5) |
0.63 (0.15–1.4) |
2.30 |
72.06 (45–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Word-processing |
4.07 (1.6–8) |
1.23 (0.45–2) |
2.84 |
62.50 (35–72.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Education level |
||||
|
|
||||
|
High school |
4.90 (2–8) |
1.33 (1–2) |
3.58 |
56.50 (35–72.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Tertiary |
2.94 (0.47–6) |
0.73 (0.1–1.6) |
2.22 |
70.90 (35–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Gender |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Female |
2.95 (0.47–7) |
0.87 (0.1–2) |
2.08 |
66.53 (35–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Male |
3.75 (0.5–8) |
0.76 (0.2–1.6) |
2.99 |
71.46 (42.5–92.5) |
|
|
||||
|
Age |
||||
|
|
||||
|
20–29 |
2.52 (0.47–8) |
0.39 (0.1–1) |
2.13 |
72.75 (42.5–95) |
|
|
||||
|
30–39 |
4.29 (1.6–7) |
1.21 (0.25–2) |
3.08 |
67.50 (35–97.5) |
|
|
||||
|
40–49 |
3.51 (1.6–5) |
1.02 (0.45–1.5) |
2.49 |
64.50 (35–75) |
|
|
||||
|
50–59 |
3.00 (2–5) |
0.88 (0.5–1) |
2.13 |
69.38 (55–85) |
|
|
||||
|
The table shows the average time taken to complete task one and task two, the difference in the average time taken to complete task one and two and the average SUS. The range (minimum and maximum) of these indicators is shown between brackets. |
||||
|
Vanmeulebrouk et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2008 7:53 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-53 |
||||