Table 1 |
||||||
|
Properties of the clusters discussed in this paper. |
||||||
| Cluster |
Pop |
Pct_Pop |
p-value |
SMR |
Pct_NH |
County# |
|
|
||||||
| A |
8387.8 k |
5.76% |
0.001 |
1.25 |
52.4% |
21 |
| B |
4928.8 k |
3.38% |
0.001 |
1.3 |
0% |
1 |
| C |
23,249 k |
16.0% |
0.001 |
1.28 |
40.8% |
790 |
| D |
360.5 k |
0.25% |
0.000 |
1.84 |
0% |
1 |
| E |
4957.2 k |
3.41% |
0.001 |
1.53 |
30% |
260 |
| F |
878.8 k |
0.6% |
0.001 |
1.59 |
25.5% |
47 |
| G |
454.4 k |
0.3% |
0.005 |
1.74 |
18.8% |
16 |
| H |
60154.3 k |
41.3% |
0.001 |
1.14 |
45.4% |
1644 |
|
|
||||||
|
The table list following properties for the clusters: Pop (population at risk), Pct_Pop (the percentage of total population at risk), p-value, SMR (Standardized Mortality Ratio), Pct_NH (the percentage of the counties in a cluster that are not in high risk), and County# (the number of counties contained in a cluster). Extremely small p-values (e.g., less than 0.001) are reported by SaTScan as 0.000, which means extremely small values rather than 0. |
||||||
|
Chen et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2008 7:57 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-57 |
||||||
