Table 3

Results of PEA scenarios (100 model runs each) for varying individual patterns of movement

Individual

Non-weighted

Low safety

High safety

(residence)

1 (59)

0.25

0.25

0.24

0.37

0.38

0.37

0.60

0.62

0.58

0.21

0.33

0.55

0.14

0.28

0.42

2 (39)

0.28

0.29

0.28

0.41

0.42

0.41

0.57

0.59

0.55

0.24

0.38

0.52

0.17

0.31

0.42

3 (21)

0.31

0.31

0.30

0.47

0.47

0.46

0.76

0.77

0.75

0.27

0.42

0.69

0.18

0.33

0.53

4 (122)

0.35

0.35

0.34

0.53

0.53

0.52

0.78

0.79

0.76

0.29

0.48

0.69

0.20

0.38

0.56

5 (184)

0.24

0.24

0.23

0.38

0.38

0.37

0.47

0.49

0.45

0.22

0.34

0.41

0.15

0.27

0.32

6 (133)

0.13

0.13

0.12

0.20

0.20

0.19

0.31

0.33

0.30

0.11

0.17

0.28

0.08

0.13

0.20

= mean of exposure magnitudes, = mean of frequency values (proportional count; 1.0 = 192 time steps), = mean of duration values (proportional count of subsequent time steps; 1.0 = 32 time steps). In the scenario "non-weighted" lower confidence limits (LCL; subscripted) and upper confidence limits (UCL; superscripted) of the means (95% confidence level) are given; these ranges would be comparable for the means in both safety scenarios.

Leyk et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2009 8:17   doi:10.1186/1476-072X-8-17