Research

A supervised land cover classification of a western Kenya lowland endemic for human malaria: associations of land cover with larval Anopheles habitats

FM Mutuku^1,2 , MN Bayoh^1,2 , AW Hightower¹ , JM Vulule² , JE Gimnig³ , JM Mueke⁴ , FA Amimo⁵ and ED Walker^2,6

¹  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya

²  Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya

³  Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

⁴  Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

⁵  Department of Biology, University of Eastern Africa, Baraton, Kenya

⁶  Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

author email corresponding author email

International Journal of Health Geographics 2009, 8:19doi:10.1186/1476-072X-8-19

Published:	16 April 2009

Abstract

Background

A supervised land cover classification was developed from very high resolution IKONOS satellite data and extensive ground truth sampling of a ca. 10 sq km malaria-endemic lowland in western Kenya. The classification was then applied to an investigation of distribution of larval Anopheles habitats. The hypothesis was that the distribution and abundance of aquatic habitats of larvae of various species of mosquitoes in the genus Anopheles is associated with identifiable landscape features.

Results and discussion

The classification resulted in 7 distinguishable land cover types, each with a distinguishable vegetation pattern, was highly accurate (89%, Kappa statistic = 0.86), and had a low rate of omission and commission errors. A total of 1,198 habitats and 19,776 Anopheles larvae of 9 species were quantified in samples from a rainy season, and 184 habitats and 582 larvae from a dry season. Anopheles gambiae s.l. was the dominant species complex (51% of total) and A. arabiensis the dominant species. Agricultural land covers (mature maize fields, newly cultivated fields, and pastured grasslands) were positively associated with presence of larval habitats, and were located relatively close to stream channels; whilst nonagricultural land covers (short shrubs, medium shrubs, tall shrubs, and bare soil around residences) were negatively associated with presence of larval habitats and were more distant from stream channels. Number of larval habitats declined exponentially with distance from streams. IKONOS imagery was not useful in direct detection of larval habitats because they were small and turbid (resembling bare soil), but was useful in localization of them through statistical associations with specific land covers.

Conclusion

A supervised classification of land cover types in rural, lowland, western Kenya revealed a largely human-modified and fragmented landscape consisting of agricultural and domestic land uses. Within it, larval habitats of Anopheles vectors of human malaria were associated with certain land cover types, of largely agricultural origin, and close to streams. Knowledge of these associations can inform malaria control to gather information on potential larval habitats more efficiently than by field survey and can do so over large areas.