Methodology
Risk of cancer in the vicinity of municipal solid waste incinerators: importance of using a flexible modelling strategy
-
* Corresponding author: Sarah Goria s.goria@invs.sante.fr
1 Institute of Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Saint-Maurice, France
2 Isère Cancer Registry, Myelan, France
3 French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety (Afsset), Maisons-Alfort, France
4 CNRS n 6249 "Chrono-Environment", Faculty of Medicine, Besançon, France
5 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
International Journal of Health Geographics 2009, 8:31 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-8-31
Published: 28 May 2009Abstract
Background
We conducted an ecological study in four French administrative departments and highlighted an excess risk in cancer morbidity for residents around municipal solid waste incinerators. The aim of this paper is to show how important are advanced tools and statistical techniques to better assess weak associations between the risk of cancer and past environmental exposures.
Methods
The steps to evaluate the association between the risk of cancer and the exposure to incinerators, from the assessment of exposure to the definition of the confounding variables and the statistical analysis carried out are detailed and discussed. Dispersion modelling was used to assess exposure to sixteen incinerators. A geographical information system was developed to define an index of exposure at the IRIS level that is the geographical unit we considered.
Population density, rural/urban status, socio-economic deprivation, exposure to air pollution from traffic and from other industries were considered as potential confounding factors and defined at the IRIS level. Generalized additive models and Bayesian hierarchical models were used to estimate the association between the risk of cancer and the index of exposure to incinerators accounting for the confounding factors.
Results
Modelling to assess the exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators allowed accounting for factors known to influence the exposure (meteorological data, point source characteristics, topography). The statistical models defined allowed modelling extra-Poisson variability and also non-linear relationships between the risk of cancer and the exposure to incinerators and the confounders.
Conclusion
In most epidemiological studies distance is still used as a proxy for exposure. This can lead to significant exposure misclassification. Additionally, in geographical correlation studies the non-linear relationships are usually not accounted for in the statistical analysis. In studies of weak associations it is important to use advanced methods to better assess dose-response relationships with disease risk.