Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Average proportion of counties within clusters which had higher than expected human WNV rates. |
|||||||
|
Year |
1% |
2% |
5% |
7% |
10% |
20% |
30% |
|
|
|||||||
|
2002 |
0.60 |
0.56 |
0.49 |
0.49 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.41 |
|
2003 |
0.66 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.60 |
0.65 |
|
2004 |
0.51 |
0.50 |
0.43 |
0.40 |
0.39 |
0.26 |
0.24 |
|
2005 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
0.46 |
0.45 |
0.36 |
0.40 |
0.36 |
|
2006 |
0.63 |
0.57 |
0.54 |
0.52 |
0.46 |
0.41 |
0.57 |
|
2007 |
0.53 |
0.55 |
0.49 |
0.48 |
0.47 |
0.45 |
0.42 |
|
2008 |
0.43 |
0.47 |
0.33 |
0.35 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.34 |
|
All years |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.64 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
Overall average |
0.58 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.43 |
0.45 |
|
|
|||||||
|
For all clusters in a given year/population threshold combination, the proportion of counties within that cluster which had a higher than expected human WNV incidence rate was calculated. These proportions were then averaged for each year/population threshold and compiled in this table. |
|||||||
|
Sugumaran et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2009 8:43 doi:10.1186/1476-072X-8-43 |
|||||||