Table 5

Percentage of the region's population that scores in the highest quintile of material and social deprivation indexes* (2001)

ith quintile for material dimension

ith quintile for social dimension


HR+

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5


01

3.9

15.6

16.4

20.2

43.9

25.6

25.4

26.4

17.5

5.1


02

3.8

15.0

20.2

27.4

33.6

28.7

26.0

18.9

17.3

9.1


03

30.7

22.2

18.3

15.9

13.0

17.0

21.4

18.4

18.2

25


04

7.85

14.8

24.2

28.55

24.55

17.6

24.7

23.6

17.2

17


05

11.5

26.5

22

24.3

15.6

16.7

21.8

22.2

19.2

20


06

28.2

18.5

16.4

17.0

19.9

12.1

10.5

14.5

26.6

36.3


07

30.0

17.4

14.5

16.2

21.8

22.3

19.1

18.1

19.4

21.1


08

0.8

10

19.9

26

43.2

18.8

28.6

22.5

19.2

10.8


09

3.1

16.2

21.4

18.9

40.4

30.2

26.1

17.6

21.0

5.2


11

0.0

3.4

7.6

8.9

80.2

41.3

23.3

25.4

9.8

0.2


12

10.4

17.6

29.6

24.1

18.3

28.9

28.3

21.6

15.6

5.7


13

26.4

29.1

23.3

13.2

8.1

29.6

19.1

16.7

19.9

14.7


14

10.6

20.7

20.3

26.5

21.8

20.4

26.1

29.0

15.0

9.5


15

18.5

21.0

22.6

22.2

15.7

16.7

24.7

23

22.1

13.6


16

23.4

25.0

22.1

19.2

10.3

23.3

21.2

22.2

17.4

15.9


* The material dimension is a socio-economic indicator based on education level, the employment/population ratio and the mean income. The social dimension takes into account the level of exclusion from a social network due to a separation, a divorce, widowhood, a single parenthood, or the fact of living alone.

+ HR stands for health region

Bayentin et al. International Journal of Health Geographics 2010 9:5   doi:10.1186/1476-072X-9-5

Open Data