<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal of Health Geographics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Journal of Health Geographics</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/6" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/15">
        <title>Measuring geographic access to health care: raster and
network-based methods</title>
        <description>Background:
Inequalities in geographic access to health care result from the configuration of facilities, population distribution, and the transportation infrastructure. In recent accessibility studies, the traditional distance measure (Euclidean) has been replaced with more plausible measures such as travel distance or time. Both network and raster-based methods are often utilized for estimating travel time in a Geographic Information System. Therefore, exploring the differences in the underlying data models and associated methods and their impact on geographic accessibility estimates is warranted.
Methods:
We examine the assumptions present in population-based travel time models. Conceptual and practical differences between raster and network data models are reviewed, along with methodological implications for service area estimates. Our case study investigates Limited Access Areas defined by Michigan&apos;s Certificate of Need (CON) Program. Geographic accessibility is calculated by identifying the number of people residing more than 30 minutes from an acute care hospital. Both network and raster-based methods are implemented and their results are compared. We also examine sensitivity to changes in travel speed settings and population assignment.
Results:
In both methods, the areas identified as having limited accessibility were similar in their location, configuration, and shape. However, the number of people identified as having limited accessibility varied substantially between methods. Over all permutations, the raster-based method identified more area and people with limited accessibility. The raster-based method was more sensitive to travel speed settings, while the network-based method was more sensitive to the specific population assignment method employed in Michigan.
Conclusions:
Differences between the underlying data models help to explain the variation in results between raster and network-based methods. Considering that the choice of data model/method may substantially alter the outcomes of a geographic accessibility analysis, we advise researchers to use caution in model selection. For policy, we recommend that Michigan adopt the network-based method or reevaluate the travel speed assignment rule in the raster-based method. Additionally, we recommend that the state revisit the populationassignment method.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Delamater</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Messina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ashton Shortridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sue Grady</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/14">
        <title>Creating a replicable, valid cross-platform buffering technique: The sausage network buffer for measuring food and physical activity built environments
</title>
        <description>Background:
Obesity researchers increasingly use geographic information systems to measure exposure and access in neighborhood food and physical activity environments. This paper proposes a network buffering approach, the &quot;sausage&quot; buffer. This method can be consistently and easily replicated across software versions and platforms, avoiding problems with proprietary systems that use different approaches in creating such buffers.
Methods:
In this paper, we describe how the sausage buffering approach was developed to be repeatable across platforms and places. We also examine how the sausage buffer compares with existing alternatives in terms of buffer size and shape, measurements of the food and physical activity environments, and associations between environmental features and health-related behaviors. We test the proposed buffering approach using data from EAT 2010 (Eating and Activity in Teens), a study examining multi-level factors associated with eating, physical activity, and weight status in adolescents (n = 2,724) in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota.
Results:
Results show that the sausage buffer is comparable in area to the classic ArcView 3.3 network buffer particularly for larger buffer sizes. It obtains similar results to other buffering techniques when measuring variables associated with the food and physical activity environments and when measuring the correlations between such variables and outcomes such as physical activity and food purchases.
Conclusions:
Findings from various tests in the current study show that researchers can obtain results using sausage buffers that are similar to results they would obtain by using other buffering techniques. However, unlike proprietary buffering techniques, the sausage buffer approach can be replicated across software programs and versions, allowing more independence of research from specific software.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Ann Forsyth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Van Riper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicole Larson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Wall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dianne Neumark-Sztainer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/13">
        <title>Near-present and future distribution of Anopheles albimanus in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin modeled with climate and topographic data</title>
        <description>Background:
Anopheles albimanus is among the most important vectors of human malaria in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin (M-C). Here, we use topographic data and 1950-2000 climate (near present), and future climate (2080) layers obtained from general circulation models (GCMs) to project the probability of the species&apos; presence, p(s), using the species distribution model MaxEnt.
Results:
The projected near-present distribution parameterized with 314 presence points related well to the known geographic distribution in the study region. Different model experiments suggest that the range of An. albimanus based on near-present climate surfaces covered at least 1.27 million km2 in the M-C, although 2080 range was projected to decrease to 1.19 million km2. Modeled p(s) was generally highest in Mesoamerica where many of the original specimens were collected. MaxEnt projected near-present maximum elevation at 1,937 m whereas 2080 maximum elevation was projected at 2,118 m. 2080 climate scenarios generally showed increased p(s) in Mesoamerica, although results varied for northern South America and no major range expansion into the mid-latitudes was projected by 2080.
Conclusions:
MaxEnt experiments with near present and future climate data suggest that An. albimanus is likely to invade high-altitude (&gt;2,000 m) areas by 2080 and therefore place many more people at risk of malaria in the M-C region even though latitudinal range expansion may be limited.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Fuller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Ahumada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Quiñones</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sócrates Herrera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Beier</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/12">
        <title>A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google EarthTM imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq</title>
        <description>Background:
Mortality estimates can measure and monitor the impacts of conflict on a population, guide humanitarian efforts, and help to better understand the public health impacts of conflict. Vital statistics registration and surveillance systems are rarely functional in conflict settings, posing a challenge of estimating mortality using retrospective population-based surveys.
Results:
We present a two-stage cluster sampling method for application in population-based mortality surveys. The sampling method utilizes gridded population data and a geographic information system (GIS) to select clusters in the first sampling stage and Google Earth TM imagery and sampling grids to select households in the second sampling stage. The sampling method is implemented in a household mortality study in Iraq in 2011. Factors affecting feasibility and methodological quality are described.
Conclusion:
Sampling is a challenge in retrospective population-based mortality studies and alternatives that improve on the conventional approaches are needed. The sampling strategy presented here was designed to generate a representative sample of the Iraqi population while reducing the potential for bias and considering the context specific challenges of the study setting. This sampling strategy, or variations on it, are adaptable and should be considered and tested in other conflict settings.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Lindsay Galway</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathaniel Bell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sahar Al Shatari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amy Hagopian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gilbert Burnham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abraham Flaxman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Rajaratnam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tim Takaro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/11">
        <title>Racial differences in the built environment--body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods</title>
        <description>Background:
Built environment features of neighborhoods may be related to obesity among adolescents and potentially related to obesity-related health disparities. The purpose of this study was to investigate spatial relationships between various built environment features and body mass index (BMI) z-score among adolescents, and to investigate if race/ethnicity modifies these relationships. A secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of findings to the spatial scale of analysis (i.e. 400- and 800-meter street network buffers).
Methods:
Data come from the 2008 Boston Youth Survey, a school-based sample of public high school students in Boston, MA. Analyses include data collected from students who had georeferenced residential information and complete and valid data to compute BMI z-score (n = 1,034). We built a spatial database using GIS with various features related to access to walking destinations and to community design. Spatial autocorrelation in key study variables was calculated with the Global Moran&apos;s I statistic. We fit conventional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and spatial simultaneous autoregressive error models that control for the spatial autocorrelation in the data as appropriate. Models were conducted using the total sample of adolescents as well as including an interaction term for race/ethnicity, adjusting for several potential individual- and neighborhood-level confounders and clustering of students within schools.
Results:
We found significant positive spatial autocorrelation in the built environment features examined (Global Moran&apos;s I most [greater than or equal to] 0.60; all p = 0.001) but not in BMI z-score (Global Moran&apos;s I = 0.07, p = 0.28). Because we found significant spatial autocorrelation in our OLS regression residuals, we fit spatial autoregressive models. Most built environment features were not associated with BMI z-score. Density of bus stops was associated with a higher BMI z-score among Whites (Coefficient: 0.029, p &lt; 0.05). The interaction term for Asians in the association between retail destinations and BMI z-score was statistically significant and indicated an inverse association. Sidewalk completeness was significantly associated with a higher BMI z-score for the total sample (Coefficient: 0.010, p &lt; 0.05). These significant associations were found for the 800-meter buffer.
Conclusion:
Some relationships between the built environment and adolescent BMI z-score were in the unexpected direction. Our findings overall suggest that the built environment does not explain a large proportion of the variation in adolescent BMI z-score or racial disparities in adolescent obesity. However, there are some differences by race/ethnicity that require further research among adolescents.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Dustin Duncan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcia Castro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Gortmaker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jared Aldstadt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Melly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Bennett</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/10">
        <title>Determining optimal neighborhood size for ecological studies using leave-one-out cross validation</title>
        <description>We employed a leave-one-out cross validation to determine optimally sized neighborhood. Variations between a single point and the other points within each filter size for all the points in the study area were evaluated, and the mean squared error (MSE) for each filter was calculated. The filter with the lowest MSE was considered as the optimal neighborhood. The method is useful in determining the optimal neighborhood for both geographic and population filters.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Deok Ryun Kim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dipika Sur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Khatib</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Wierzba</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/9">
        <title>Permitted water pollution discharges and population cancer and non-cancer mortality: toxicity weights and upstream discharge effects in US rural-urban areas</title>
        <description>Background:
The study conducts statistical and spatial analyses to investigate amounts and types of permitted surface water pollution discharges in relation to population mortality rates for cancer and non-cancer causes nationwide and by urban-rural setting. Data from the Environmental Protection Agency&apos;s (EPA) Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) were used to measure the location, type, and quantity of a selected set of 38 discharge chemicals for 10,395 facilities across the contiguous US. Exposures were refined by weighting amounts of chemical discharges by their estimated toxicity to human health, and by estimating the discharges that occur not only in a local county, but area-weighted discharges occurring upstream in the same watershed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mortality files were used to measure age-adjusted population mortality rates for cancer, kidney disease, and total non-cancer causes. Analysis included multiple linear regressions to adjust for population health risk covariates. Spatial analyses were conducted by applying geographically weighted regression to examine the geographic relationships between releases and mortality.
Results:
Greater non-carcinogenic chemical discharge quantities were associated with significantly higher non-cancer mortality rates, regardless of toxicity weighting or upstream discharge weighting. Cancer mortality was higher in association with carcinogenic discharges only after applying toxicity weights. Kidney disease mortality was related to higher non-carcinogenic discharges only when both applying toxicity weights and including upstream discharges. Effects for kidney mortality and total non-cancer mortality were stronger in rural areas than urban areas. Spatial results show correlations between non-carcinogenic discharges and cancer mortality for much of the contiguous United States, suggesting that chemicals not currently recognized as carcinogens may contribute to cancer mortality risk. The geographically weighted regression results suggest spatial variability in effects, and also indicate that some rural communities may be impacted by upstream urban discharges.
Conclusions:
There is evidence that permitted surface water chemical discharges are related to population mortality. Toxicity weights and upstream discharges are important for understanding some mortality effects. Chemicals not currently recognized as carcinogens may nevertheless play a role in contributing to cancer mortality risk. Spatial models allow for the examination of geographic variability not captured through the regression models.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Hendryx</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamison Conley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evan Fedorko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juhua Luo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Armistead</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/8">
        <title>Utilization of combined remote sensing techniques to detect environmental variables influencing malaria vector densities in rural West Africa</title>
        <description>IntroductionThe use of remote sensing has found its way into the field of epidemiology within the last decades. With the increased sensor resolution of recent and future satellites new possibilities emerge for high resolution risk modeling and risk mapping.
Methods:
A SPOT 5 satellite image, taken during the rainy season 2009 was used for calculating indices by combining the image&apos;s spectral bands. Besides the widely used Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) other indices were tested for significant correlation against field observations. Multiple steps, including the detection of surface water, its breeding appropriateness for Anopheles and modeling of vector imagines abundance, were performed. Data collection on larvae, adult vectors and geographic parameters in the field, was amended by using remote sensing techniques to gather data on altitude (Digital Elevation Model = DEM), precipitation (Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission = TRMM), land surface temperatures (LST).
Results:
The DEM derived altitude as well as indices calculations combining the satellite&apos;s spectral bands (NDTI = Normalized Difference Turbidity Index, NDWI Mac Feeters = Normalized Difference Water Index) turned out to be reliable indicators for surface water in the local geographic setting. While Anopheles larvae abundance in habitats is driven by multiple, interconnected factors - amongst which the NDVI - and precipitation events, the presence of vector imagines was found to be correlated negatively to remotely sensed LST and positively to the cumulated amount of rainfall in the preceding 15 days and to the Normalized Difference Pond Index (NDPI) within the 500 m buffer zone around capture points.
Conclusions:
Remotely sensed geographical and meteorological factors, including precipitations, temperature, as well as vegetation, humidity and land cover indicators could be used as explanatory variables for surface water presence, larval development and imagines densities. This modeling approach based on remotely sensed information is potentially useful for counter measures that are putting on at the environmental side, namely vector larvae control via larviciding and water body reforming.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Dambach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vanessa Machault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Pierre Lacaux</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecile Vignolles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ali Sie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rainer Sauerborn</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/7">
        <title>Large-scale spatial population databases in infectious disease research</title>
        <description>Modelling studies on the spatial distribution and spread of infectious diseases are becoming increasingly detailed and sophisticated, with global risk mapping and epidemic modelling studies now popular. Yet, in deriving populations at risk of disease estimates, these spatial models must rely on existing global and regional datasets on population distribution, which are often based on outdated and coarse resolution data. Moreover, a variety of different methods have been used to model population distribution at large spatial scales. In this review we describe the main global gridded population datasets that are freely available for health researchers and compare their construction methods, and highlight the uncertainties inherent in these population datasets. We review their application in past studies on disease risk and dynamics, and discuss how the choice of dataset can affect results. Moreover, we highlight how the lack of contemporary, detailed and reliable data on human population distribution in low income countries is proving a barrier to obtaining accurate large-scale estimates of population at risk and constructing reliable models of disease spread, and suggest research directions required to further reduce these barriers.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Linard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Tatem</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/6">
        <title>Spatial modelling of healthcare utilisation for treatment of fever in Namibia</title>
        <description>Background:
Health care utilization is affected by several factors including geographic accessibility. Empirical data on utilization of health facilities is important to understanding geographic accessibility and defining health facility catchments at a national level. Accurately defining catchment population improves the analysis of gaps in access, commodity needs and interpretation of disease incidence. Here, empirical household survey data on treatment seeking for fever were used to model the utilisation of public health facilities and define their catchment areas and populations in northern Namibia.MethodThis study uses data from the Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) of 2009 on treatment seeking for fever among children under the age of five years to characterize facility utilisation. Probability of attendance of public health facilities for fever treatment was modelled against a theoretical surface of travel times using a three parameter logistic model. The fitted model was then applied to a population surface to predict the number of children likely to use a public health facility during an episode of fever in northern Namibia.
Results:
Overall, from the MIS survey, the prevalence of fever among children was 17.6% CI [16.0-19.1] (401 of 2,283 children) while public health facility attendance for fever was 51.1%, [95%CI: 46.2-56.0]. The coefficients of the logistic model of travel time against fever treatment at public health facilities were all significant (p &lt; 0.001). From this model, probability of facility attendance remained relatively high up to 180 minutes (3 hours) and thereafter decreased steadily. Total public health facility catchment population of children under the age five was estimated to be 162,286 in northern Namibia with an estimated fever burden of 24,830 children. Of the estimated fevers, 8,021 (32.3%) were within 30 minutes of travel time to the nearest health facility while 14,902 (60.0%) were within 1 hour.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates the potential of routine household surveys to empirically model health care utilisation for the treatment of childhood fever and define catchment populations enhancing the possibilities of accurate commodity needs assessment and calculation of disease incidence. These methods could be extended to other African countries where detailed mapping of health facilities exists.</description>
        <link>http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/11/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Victor Alegana</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jim Wright</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uusiku Petrina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abdisalan Noor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Snow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Atkinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal of Health Geographics 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-072X-11-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal of Health Geographics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-072X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

